Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Adam Walton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Walton analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Adam Walton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Walton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.21% of points on their second serve, while Walton has won 54.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 53.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Walton has won 49.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.25% and 32.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Walton has saved 64.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 40/ 28), with Walton winning 65.96% (W/L 62/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 215/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Walton has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 145/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16), where as Walton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.09% of matches (W/L 53/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Walton being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Walton winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Walton was at the Bengaluru Challenger, 16-02-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Walton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Walton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Walton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.91 while Walton has played against players with an average rank of 285.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Walton has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Walton has converted 41.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
95
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
96
Rank
95
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (318-207)
Career Total W/L
68% (150-71)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
69% (36-16)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$85,495
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Adam Walton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:13 | 2:6:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (52/70) | 68% (53/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (33/52) | 57% (30/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (12/18) | 44% (11/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (37/78) | 36% (25/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Adam Walton
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Adam Walton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 69% (36/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 62% (76/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (393/343) | 54% (649/546) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 72% (36/14) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 235 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:34 | 1:47:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.56 | 281.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1662/2372) | 63% (2262/3612) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1103/1662) | 73% (1652/2262) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (392/710) | 55% (738/1350) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (101/214) | 42% (145/349) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (923/2332) | 39% (1468/3740) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (10/4) | 74% (32/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 72% (36/50) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 61% (17/28) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 75% (12/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (22/17) | 97% (30/29) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (22/5) | 3% (30/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 32% (22/7) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Walton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Adam Walton
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James Duckworth
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
6
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Adam Walton
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
22%
(
8 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Alex Bolt
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
47 of
102)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Walton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sumit Nagal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
